![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Jean Charest after coming a distant second to Pierre Poilievre. “You deserve a clean slate and the opportunity to unite the membership. ... Only Liberals benefit from a divided (Conservative Party).” Will the malcontents listen?
The IOC is not our friend. There's one correction to this list Free Pistol is no longer an Olympic medalled event. IIRC, last medalled event was in South America. (2014-15?)
Sad thing is, it was the eldest shooting event since 1897.
They quietly dropped it and the complicit media didn't even raise one eyebrow. 50 meter men's pistol event.
Technically one could have competed in a sanctioned 50 meter match, single handed bullseye, using a single loaded revolver or semi auto in 22 LR. You would be up against a brick wall. Everyone else with Toz-35, Hammerli, Pardini and ergonomic grips.
But it's gone now so....
They tried this malarkey for the London Olympics pentathlon event. It's several disciplines: running swimming horse back riding fencing pistol match.
They wanted to eliminate the match air pistol to some light emitted ghey thing. Didn't happen.
The IOC is always trying to carve off a shooting discipline!
Last edited by Brutus; 10-21-2022 at 09:17 PM.
Canadian government runs on trans, ###s and French speaking women. Let them fight the next war over there.
Myself i will crack a beer and merely watch.
Sure. But it is a shooting discipline that deserves recognition. Olympic Committees are hoping persons such as yourself become the majority so without resistance they have carte blanche to chop away at another shooting event.
Pistol events are seemingly always endangered.
Canadian government runs on trans, ###s and French speaking women. Let them fight the next war over there.
Myself i will crack a beer and merely watch.
I don't think the idea is without merit but as mentioned I have no doubt that the Federal body, which is federally funded, will be at risk of having funding pulled as a threat if they even considered such an idea.
Reading over the regulations, it seems like the best approach would be for provinces with more "friendly" CFOs (as they're the ones who will consider the "letter") and approach their respective provincial regulating bodies for such a letter for a transfer.
I also think that since there's no definition of what constitutes "training" or "competing" that it can be argued that any 22lr pistol can fit the bill as one who is "training" for the discipline without experience shouldn't be expected to fork up 3 grand for a Walther GSP for example. I will admit I am not very experienced with Olympic shooting as some other posters in this thread but from what I can see Free Pistol - which is the basis of trying to get most other 22lrs in besides competition ones - is still on the Paralympic program, no?
Jean Charest after coming a distant second to Pierre Poilievre. “You deserve a clean slate and the opportunity to unite the membership. ... Only Liberals benefit from a divided (Conservative Party).” Will the malcontents listen?
You are hoping that there are many more shootings......no wonder the world is such a mess......isn't that what caused all the gun control in the first place...won't more shootings lead to more control......bad place to express these types of opinions when anyone can read them......
This is the new Republica de Canadazuela
You're out!