This seems a better bet than the BCL Siberian.
No Joke.
This seems a better bet than the BCL Siberian.
No Joke.
What are your thoughts on both? Seems like a lot of bad press right now for the Siberian. The SU is "lower grade" but seems to be fairly reliable after some rough patches of weak receiver modling etc in the first few years. Keltec has been making these for 20 years - you'd think it'd be pretty settled by now?
BCL is much more solid and accurate, also more aftermarket support.
And according to my cheap reloads,way more accurate.
SU is light and cheap. The after market pistol grip is cobbled together with bolts and the handguard is wobbly.
Accuracy is around 2 -3 MOA with factory match ammo.
I know the BCL has a couple of issues but so do the SU.
It’s really not fair comparing two completely different price guns.
If you don’t mind the look and feel of the SU , by all means , get one.
The warranty will cover the original owner in case a rear blowout.
It has the best stocktrigger you’ll ever find on a cheap semi.I don’t know if it’s been resolved but I do recall a few incidents after they said it was resolved.
I have owned 5 of them , just beware, they will not scratch the AR itch.
But other than that, they’re not terrible
"Among the many misdeeds of British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest." - Mohandas Gandhi
Considering our options these days, they are a great gun for the price. Buddy has one and it easily kept up with ARs during 3 gun. The broken receiver issue had nothing to do with the reciever and rather the op rod unthreading. Kel-Tec fixed that many years ago.
Just saying it how it is.....