***Terms of all sales***
-"I'll take it" with payment trumps all dialogue
- Insurance is Buyers responsibly, so please request
view photos ask your wife BEFORE making offers
There's talk of banning any *firearm* that was originally designed to have a magazine capacity greater than 5. So I wouldn't worry too much about pinned magazines; that's small potatoes. A bit of a red herring.
***** FREE THE WEST *****
What is the name of the person who unpinned the magazine and what is their location. They committed a federal offense and should be charged. Also a link to whatever evidence shows them unpinning a magazine and where they turned it into. Those cops should have arrested that person immediately regardless of the circumstance behind committing the offense. That section is very black and white.
If I am not mistaken the whole mag thing happened in Quebec.
The Quebec government treats law abiding firearms owners like "#####" and criminals like "royalties".
As long as the criminals help advance their gun control agenda.
Roy
Ralph
Real name Roy, Ralph was my dog.
Firearms user for 56 years. Owner for 50.
Proud to say that I have introduced nearly that many new people to the sport. And more on the way. +8
It just never freaking ends, does it.
Guys i'll make it really clear for everyone. The average quebecois doesn't like this any more than you do, only the ones who get their opinions from mass media and TV just like everywhere else in the world, but it's especially strong in Quebec because of the language barrier to hearing alternate viewpoints. Quebec has a revolving door system between Politics, Television and Business; so it's all the same group of strivers doing these things in the hopes they'll be rewarded. Quebec is the proving grounds and laboratory where all the woke, globalist, authoritarian stuff gets rolled out first, then to the rest of Canada if not the world, our media class is directly in sync with whatever shadowy cabal you want to imagine, they jump when told. La Presse is notoriously close to the federal Liberals, a very federalist newspaper, it's regarded as their mouthpiece. This journalist didn't just wake up one day with this idea, he got a call from some liberals or NGO and told to do this to grease the wheels. The idea that he could actually be charged for this crime is, i'm sorry, just hilarious to me; it really shows, if unironic, how naive people are regarding the Law with a capital L and how it works. Of course he won't be charged, the ones who write the laws told him to do it! Don't be naive, please.
All that being said, i need to marry an American. Woman OR man, at this point i don't really care anymore lmao.
I get your point but having an unpinned magazine isn’t analogous to drinking and driving. It’s more analogous to having a drink in your basement workshop.
Drinking and driving kills people, having an unpinned magazine hasn’t killed or hurt anyone.
Please don’t think like THEM.
The solution to drinking and driving isn’t having beer cans blocked at 150ml
Reasonable take ^^^.
I think many are just pissed (myself included) that he's a liebral and just gets away with it.
It really is a stupid law though. Anyone not obeying the law would not obey another law. It's just how it is.
It feels like their whole "plan" is to make shooting sports and hunting so full of useless laws that people just give up, due to the headache of complying with so many bs laws.
Battle of attrition. They will just make so many assinine and useless laws until the person just gives up.. I think this is what they are actually trying to do.
Last edited by Junction; 12-02-2023 at 02:57 PM. Reason: formatting
Another wave of propaganda, and a new strain of BULLSHHT!!!
You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink! -unknown
We are annoyed by the assumption on the part of certain public figures that the citizen should be able to prove the need for the citizen to acquire a means of protecting himself. The citizens personal needs are certainly no business of the state. Liberty, when it's in place, grants the right of the citizen to do what he chooses, as long as he does not stamp on the rights of others.
JEFF COOPER
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
We are annoyed by the assumption on the part of certain public figures that the citizen should be able to prove the need for the citizen to acquire a means of protecting himself. The citizens personal needs are certainly no business of the state. Liberty, when it's in place, grants the right of the citizen to do what he chooses, as long as he does not stamp on the rights of others.
JEFF COOPER
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]